MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098637476 · doi:10.1109/ias.2000.881916

A nonlinear model of AC-field-induced parametric waves on a water surface

2002· article· en· W2098637476 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua A. Robinson, M.A. Bergougnou, G.S.P. Castle, I.I. Inculet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplitudePhysicsMathieu functionMechanicsElectric fieldElectrohydrodynamicsNonlinear systemSurface waveWavelengthParametric statisticsClassical mechanicsOpticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

So-called parametric excitations occur as a result of a time-dependent change in a parameter (e.g., rigidity, gravitational acceleration, etc.) of a system. Such a wave can be formed on the surface of a conductive liquid by applying an AC electric field perpendicularly to the surface. It has previously been shown that, using a linearized analysis, this electrohydrodynamic phenomenon can be described mathematically by the Mathieu equation. This linearized analysis is successful at predicting the wavelength and frequency of the parametric wave, but it predicts unlimited growth and therefore cannot determine the resulting amplitude or phase. This paper presents a nonlinear extension of the linearized model, resulting in a nonlinear form of the Mathieu equation. The nonlinear model, which accounts for the change in the force due to surface tension as the wave amplitude grows, results in a prediction of the finite wave amplitude, and gives a prediction of the phase of the finite wave with respect to the exciting AC field. Viscous damping of the liquid is considered. A spatially sinusoidal wave shape is assumed, but the model can accommodate different curvatures of the upward and downward phases of the wave. The model explains why electric discharging above a water surface often occurs after the applied electric field has started to decline from its peak. Experimental measurements (obtained using a channel of water) of wave amplitude and phase are compared with predictions from the model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207