Unsupervised and Uncued Segmentation of the Fundamental Heart Sounds in Phonocardiograms Using a Time-Scale Representation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A methodology is proposed to segment and label the fundamental activities, namely the first and second heart sounds, S1 and S2of the phonocardiogram (PCG). Information supplementary to the PCG, such as a cue from a synchronously acquired electrocardiogram (ECG), subject-specific prior information, or training examples regarding the activities, is not required by the proposed methodology. A bank of Morlet wavelet correlators is used to obtain a time-scale representation of the PCG. An energy profile of the time-scale representation and a singular value decomposition (SVD) technique are used to identify segments of the PCG that contain the fundamental activities. The robustness of the methodology is demonstrated by the correct segmentation of over 90% of 1068 fundamental activities in a challenging set of PCGs which were recorded from patients with normally functioning and abnormally functioning bioprosthetic valves. The PCGs included highly varying fundamental activities that overlapped in time and frequency with other aberrant non-fundamental activities such as murmurs and noise-like artifacts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".