Cardiovascular diseases and the health‐related quality of life after total hip replacement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate to what degree total hip replacement, or co-morbidities or their progression, influence the health-related quality of life of patients after the operation. We have looked for an objective method to reflect the severity of cardiovascular diseases and to better characterise the health-related quality of life of patients with total hip replacement. BACKGROUND: The main weakness of the different health-related quality of life methods that are applied to the analysis is the lack of information regarding the contributory role of co-morbidities, especially cardiovascular diseases. DESIGN: Retrospective longitudinal study. METHODS: This study involved 109 patients who had had total hip replacement. The patients' health status - objective and subjective functional performance at the time of operation and five years later - was evaluated using questionnaires (including EQ-5D and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities' Ostoearthritis Index scores) and the hospital database. An Objective Cardiovascular Classification grouping was developed to evaluate the deterioration of cardiovascular diseases. RESULTS: The subjective assessment of the patients' health status at Year 5 revealed highly significant differences between healthy and sick patients in respect of EQ-5D and Objective Cardiovascular Classification but not in the case of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities' Ostoearthritis Index scores. Evaluating postoperative subjective health awareness, a higher sensitivity and specificity and a significantly better individual-discriminating role was demonstrated in Objective Cardiovascular Classification vs. EQ-5D. CONCLUSION: After successful total hip replacement postoperative health awareness is influenced mainly by existing and developing cardiovascular diseases. It seems to be the case that for patients with significant hypertension, ischaemic heart disease or chronic heart failure, even successful surgery will not improve the patients' overall feeling of health. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nursing care of patients with total hip replacement, in respect of cardiovascular diseases, can contribute a better health-related quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".