MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098702232 · doi:10.1039/c2ta00868h

Effect of carbon support nanostructure on the oxygen reduction activity of Pt/C catalysts

2013· article· en· W2098702232 on OpenAlexaff
Dustin Banham, Fangxia Feng, Katie Pei, Siyu Ye, Viola Birss

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Chemistry A · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsBallard Power Systems (Canada)University of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbon fibersCarbonizationChemical engineeringMaterials scienceNanostructureMesoporous materialCatalysisElectrochemistryProton exchange membrane fuel cellAnthraceneNanotechnologyChemistryOrganic chemistryComposite materialScanning electron microscopeElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work is focussed on establishing the effect of the nanostructure of a series of ordered mesoporous carbon (OMC) support materials, after Pt loading, on the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) performance, for application in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Hexagonal mesoporous silica (HMS) templates were prepared using alkylamine surfactants with varying carbon chain lengths, producing wormhole pore diameters of 1.5–3.1 nm and silica wall thicknesses of ca. 2.3 nm. The HMS pores were then filled either with sucrose or an aromatic carbon precursor (anthracene or naphthalene), followed by carbonization and removal of the HMS in NaOH, leaving behind an interconnected carbon structure (“nano-strings”), 1.5–3.1 nm in diameter. These OMCs all have a similar, bimodal, pore size distribution, with the smaller pores (1.8 nm) attributed to removal of the HMS walls and the larger pores (∼3.5 nm) arising from incomplete filling of the HMS pores with carbon precursor. The OMCs were loaded with 20 wt% Pt, resulting in very similar Pt particle sizes (ca. 5 nm), as confirmed by XRD, TEM, and electrochemical surface area measurements. The ORR activity was found to decrease as the carbon nano-string diameter decreased, proposed to be due to a higher electronic resistance, while the degree of OMC graphitization, determined by XRD analysis, had only a minor impact on the ORR activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials Chemistry ASame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207