MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098707868 · doi:10.1002/cphc.200700348

Characteristics of Photoexcitations and Interfacial Energy Levels of Regioregular Poly(3‐hexythiophene‐2,5‐diyl) on Gold

2007· article· en· W2098707868 on OpenAlexaff
Youngku Sohn, J. Todd Stuckless

Bibliographic record

VenueChemPhysChem · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolaronPhoton energyExcitationMaterials scienceIonizationVacuum levelPhotoemission spectroscopyIonization energyAtomic physicsDipoleSpectroscopyElectronMolecular physicsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyPhotonChemistryPhysicsOpticsIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have studied characteristics of photoexcitations and interfacial electronic structures of regioregular poly(3-hexlythiophene-2,5-diyl) (P3HT) on gold using two-photon photoemission (2PPE) spectroscopy. The vacuum level threshold is decreased by 1.3 eV from that of bare gold, attributable to interface dipole effects. The 2PPE spectral width narrows as the film thickness increases. We tentatively understand that this is due to destabilization of long-lived localized polaron, attributed to strong interchain interactions. On the basis of the analysis of the 2PPE distribution as a function of photon energy and laser power, the polaron level is located at 3.1 eV below the vacuum level. Using this value and a polaron level of 1.75 eV above the HOMO, we indirectly estimate an ionization potential of 4.85 eV for P3HT. An increase in two-photon photoemission yield with increasing photon energy is attributed to an enhanced electron-hole pair dissociation yield at higher photo-excitation levels. The decrease in power law slope with increasing film thickness is understood by Langevin recombination kinetics and saturation of photoexcitations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemPhysChemSame topicOrganic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207