MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Controls on carbon accumulation and storage in the mineral subsoil beneath peat in Lakkasuo mire, central Finland

2003· article· en· W2098740300 on OpenAlex
Jukka Turunen, Tim R. Moore

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Soil Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubsoilMirePeatPodzolDissolved organic carbonTopsoilTotal organic carbonEnvironmental chemistryChemistrySoil carbonGleysolSoil scienceGeologySoil waterEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary What processes control the accumulation and storage of carbon (C) in the mineral subsoil beneath peat? To find out we investigated four podzolic mineral subsoil profiles from forest and beneath peat in Lakkasuo mire in central boreal Finland. The amount of C in the mineral subsoil ranged from 3.9 to 8.1 kg m −2 over a thickness of 70 cm and that in the organic horizons ranged from 1.8 to 144 kg m −2 . Rates of increase of subsoil C were initially large (14 g m −2 year −1 ) as the upland forest soil was paludified, but decreased to < 2 g m −2 year −1 from 150 to 3000 years. The subsoils retained extractable aluminium (Al) but lost iron (Fe) as the surrounding forest podzols were paludified beneath the peat. A stepwise, ordinary least‐squares regression indicated a strong relation ( R 2 = 0.91) between organic C concentration of 26 podzolic subsoil samples and dithionite–citrate–bicarbonate‐extractable Fe (negative), ammonium oxalate‐extractable Al (positive) and null‐point concentration of dissolved organic C (DOC np ) (positive). We examined the ability of the subsoil samples to sorb dissolved organic C from a solution derived from peat. Null‐point concentration of dissolved C (DOC np ) ranged from 35 to 83 mg l −1 , and generally decreased from the upper to the lower parts of the profiles (average E, B and C horizon DOC np concentrations of 64, 47 and 42 mg l −1 ). The DOC np was positively correlated with percentage of soil C and silt and clay content. The concentration of dissolved organic C in pore water in the peat ranged from 12 to 60 mg l −1 (average 33 mg l −1 ), suggesting that the sorptive capacity of the subsoil horizons for C had been exhausted. We suggest that the increase of C contents in the subsoil beneath mires is related to adsorption of dissolved organic C and slow mineralization under anaerobic conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it