MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098776923 · doi:10.1111/pala.12091

New rodents (<scp>C</scp>ricetidae) from the <scp>N</scp>eogene of <scp>C</scp>uraçao and <scp>B</scp>onaire, <scp>D</scp>utch <scp>A</scp>ntilles

2014· article· en· W2098776923 on OpenAlexaff
Jelle S. Zijlstra, Donald A. McFarlane, Lars W. van den Hoek Ostende, Joyce Lundberg

Bibliographic record

VenuePalaeontology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEvolution and Paleontology Studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubfamilyGenusBiologyPostcraniaZoologyPhylogenetic treeTaxonEvolutionary biologyBotanyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cordimus , a new genus of cricetid rodent, is described from N eogene deposits on the islands of C uraçao and B onaire, D utch A ntilles. The genus is characterized by strongly cuspidate molars, the presence of mesolophs in most upper molars and the absence of mesolophids in lower molars. Similarities with the early cricetid C opemys from the M iocene of N orth A merica coupled with apparent derived characters shared with the subfamily S igmodontinae suggest that C ordimus may be close to the root of the sigmodontine lineage, a possibility that remains to be tested through explicit phylogenetic analysis. Three species are recognized on the basis of size and details of molar morphology. Cordimus hooijeri sp. nov. is described from B onaire on the basis of H olocene owl pellet material that consists of dentaries and postcranial material only. This species is presumed to be extinct, but focused surveys are needed to confirm this hypothesis. Cordimus debuisonjei sp. nov. and C ordimus raton sp. nov. are described from deposits on T afelberg S anta B arbara in C uraçao. Although the age of these deposits is not known, they are most likely of late P liocene or early P leistocene age. Both are represented by numerous isolated molars and some osteological material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalaeontologySame topicEvolution and Paleontology StudiesFrench-language works237,207