MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Direct Near-infrared Luminescence Detection of Singlet Oxygen Generated by Photodynamic Therapy in Cells In Vitro and Tissues In Vivo¶

2002· article· en· W2098818048 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Niedre, Michael S. Patterson, Brian C. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenuePhotochemistry and Photobiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsHamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine ProgramMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsSinglet oxygenPhotodynamic therapyPhotosensitizerLuminescenceIn vivoChemistryPhotochemistryPhotomultiplierIntracellularBiophysicsOxygenMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsDetectorOpticsBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Singlet oxygen (1O2) is believed to be the major cytotoxic agent involved in photodynamic therapy (PDT). Measurement of 1O2 near-infrared (NIR) luminescence at 1270 nm in biological environments is confounded by the strongly reduced 1O2 lifetime and probably has never been achieved. We present evidence that this is now possible, using a new NIR-sensitive photomultiplier tube. Time-resolved 1O2 luminescence measurements were made in various solutions of aluminum tetrasulphonated phthalocyanine (AlS4Pc) and Photofrin. Measurements were also performed on suspensions of leukemia cells incubated with AlS4Pc, and a true intracellular component of the 1O2 signal was clearly identified. Time-resolved analysis showed a strongly reduced 1O2 lifetime and an increased photosensitizer triplet-state lifetime in the intracellular component. In vivo measurements were performed on normal skin and liver of Wistar rats sensitized with 50 mg/kg AlS4Pc. In each case, a small but statistically significant spectral peak was observed at 1270 nm. The 1O2 lifetime based on photon count rate measurements at 1270 nm was 0.03-0.18 micros, consistent with published upper limits. We believe that these are the first direct observations of PDT-generated intracellular and in vivo 102. The detector technology provides a new tool for PDT research and possibly clinical use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations397
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhotochemistry and PhotobiologySame topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207