MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W20988488

The formation and survival of disk galaxies

2001· dissertation· en· W20988488 on OpenAlexfundno aff
James Erskine Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de biologie clinique · 2001
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Victoria
KeywordsAstrophysicsGalaxyPsychologyAstronomyPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamical evolution of substructure within dark matter halos is of central importance in determining many aspects of galaxy formation and galaxy evolution in cold dark matter cosmologies. The overall sequence in which the different stellar components of galaxies are assembled, the survival of galactic disks, the number of dwarf satellites orbiting giant galaxies, and the nature of stellar material in galactic halos all depend on the dynamics of halo substructure. In this thesis, I develop an analytic description of the evolution of substructure within a dark matter halo, and use it to construct a semi-analytic model of the formation and evolution of disk galaxies. Substructure within an individual halo is modelled as a set of distinct subhalos, orbiting in a smooth background. These subhalos evolve through three main processes: dynamical friction, tidal mass loss, and tidal heating. By including analytic descriptions of these three processes explicitly in a simple orbital integration scheme, it is possible to reproduce the results of high-resolution numerical simulations at a fraction of the computational expense. The properties of a subhalo can be estimated with an accuracy of 20%, until it has lost most of its mass or been disrupted. Using this description of satellite dynamics, I construct a semi-analytic model for the evolution of a galaxy or cluster halo. I show that this model reproduces the basic features of numerical simulations, and use it to investigate two major problems in current galaxy formation scenarios: the prediction of excessive substructure in galaxy halos, and the survival of galactic disks in halos filled with substructure. I show that the small number of dwarf galaxies observed in the Local Group can be explained by considering the effects of reionisation on star formation in small halos. The stellar luminosities predicted in this case match the observed luminosities of local satellites. The predicted spatial distribution, sizes and characteristic velocities of dwarf galaxies are also consistent with those observed locally. Many of these satellite galaxies are disrupted by tidal stripping or encounters. I investigate the properties of their debris, and show that its total mass and spatial distribution are similar to those of the stellar halo of the Milky Way. Furthermore, the stars in this debris are mainly old, satisfying another observational constraint on models of galaxy formation. Some satellites have been disrupted fairly recently, however, suggesting that coherent tidal streams may still be visible at the present day. Finally, I investigate the effects of encounters on the central disk within the main halo. I find that the rate of disruptive encounters drops off sharply after the galaxy is assembled, such that the typical disk has remained undisturbed for the past 8–10 billion years. Less disruptive encounters are more common, and disks are often heated as they re-form after their last disruption, producing components like the thick disk of the Milky Way. These results may resolve the long-standing uncertainty about disk ages in hierarchical, cold dark matter cosmologies. It is less clear whether the bulge-to-disk mass ratios predicted by the model, for the currently favoured LCDM cosmology, are consistent with observations. The relative mass of the bulge in typical disk galaxies may place an upper limit on the age of their stellar contents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de biologie cliniqueSame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207