MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

L-Arginine in Nutrition: Multiple Beneficial Effects in the Etiopathology of Diabetes

2013· article· en· W2098934423 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ana Stančić, Aleksandra Korać, Biljana Buzadžić, Vesna Otašević, Aleksandra Janković, Milica Vučetić, Bato Korać

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nutritional Therapeutics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArginineDiabetes mellitusInsulin resistanceAmino acidEndocrinologyEndogenyHomeostasisBiologyInternal medicineMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L-arginine is a nutritionally important amino acid that controls a wide spectrum of cellular functions and physiological processes, acting by itself or through its various metabolites. There are several factors that determine overall L-arginine homeostasis: dietary supplementation, endogenous de novo synthesis, whole-body protein turnover and its extensive metabolism. The destiny of L-arginine is determined by the complex network of enzymes and pathways differentially expressed according to health and disease status. Diabetes is characterized by reduced concentrations of L-arginine in plasma and many tissues, and failure of its metabolic effects. Emerging data suggest that oral supplementation of L-arginine exerts multiple beneficial effects on the complex etiological and pathophysiological basis of diabetes including: i) β-cell function and mass and ii) obesity and peripheral insulin resistance. This review emphasizes important aspects of L-arginine action which classifies this amino acid as a promising therapeutic approach in the treatment of diabetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nutritional TherapeuticsSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207