MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098980558 · doi:10.1002/app.23380

Surface‐modified polysulfone membranes: Aqueous phase oxidation via persulfate radical

2006· article· en· W2098980558 on OpenAlexaff
Mauro M. Dal‐Cin, Michael D. Guiver, C.N. Striez, D. J. Carlsson, Ashwani Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMembrane Separation Technologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolysulfoneChemistryPersulfateAqueous solutionPotassium persulfateSurface modificationMembraneFourier transform infrared spectroscopySodium persulfateNuclear chemistryPolymer chemistryChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryPolymerCatalysisMonomer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Polysulfone (Udel P1800) ultrafiltration membranes were surface modified using potassium persulfate (K 2 S 2 O 8 ) as a free radical source in the aqueous phase. The expected modification was hydrogen abstraction leading to hydroxylation at one or two sites on the isopropylidene linkage. Reaction time, K 2 S 2 O 8 concentration, and temperature were optimized based on two criteria: (1) minimal change in pure water fluxes after surface modification and (2) reduction of adsorptive fouling with a pulp mill effluent. The pure water flux retention for an unmodified membrane was ∼20% after adsorptive fouling with the pulp mill effluent and was increased to 70% after reaction with K 2 S 2 O 8 . Angle‐resolved XPS indicated increased oxygen and a new carbon peak consistent with an aldehyde reaction occurring in the top 3.5 nm. NMR solution analysis was inconclusive because of the low sensitivity of the experiment. Further analysis of oxidation products was carried out on finely dispersed polymer. Fourier transform infrared, internal reflection spectroscopy suggested oxidation by the formation of an aldehyde which was further oxidized to carboxylic acid. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 1723–1730, 2006

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicMembrane Separation TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207