Genetic diversity, spatial patterns, and growth of root sprouts in a temperate tree at the northern distribution limit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In many plant species, population persistence at the limit of their distribution relies on clonal growth, but little is known about the consequences for genetic diversity, spatial patterns, and growth of the offspring. The rare European tree Sorbus torminalis (Rosaceae) was chosen to explore the patterns and limitations of clonal growth. Offspring were mapped in 7 small populations at the northern limit of the species' distribution, their size was recorded in 2 consecutive years, and the degree of shading (diffuse site factor, DSF) was measured at the forest floor. A subsample of offspring and adults was genotyped with microsatellites to determine the frequency of vegetative reproduction, and another group of offspring was protected against browsing. Clonal origin was observed in 98% of the offspring, and thus they were classified as root sprouts. The fine-scale distribution of the root sprouts was mainly clumped, and variation of DSF explained some of this pattern. Mixed linear modeling of root sprout size, with DSF, sprout density, and distance to the nearest adult tree as explanatory variables, suggested inter-offspring competition, but there were significant interactions among the explanatory variables, In addition, browsing by deer reduced growth of the root sprouts. Root sprout mortality was 17% after 1 y, and highest for young, small, and isolated offspring growing in high-light microhabitats. Root sprout growth and mortality were not directly affected by distance to adult trees. We conclude that clonal growth is common in the northern populations of the study species, and that root sprout distribution and growth are controlled by complex interactions between light, browsing, distance to the parent tree, and sprout density.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".