Influence of NaCl and NaHCO<sub>3</sub> upon Salix Sungkianica Seed Germination and Seedling Growth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study used the seeds and newborn seedings of Salix sungkianica as material, examining the influence of NaCl and NaHCO 3 solutions of different concentrations on the seed germination and anatomical structure of the roots and lamina of the seedings. The results indicate such facts: (1) The presents of NaCl and NaHCO 3 have a depressant effect on the seed germination, while a light concentration of NaHCO 3 could accelerate the sprout. (2) S.sungkianica seedings show strong endurance under the stress of 50 mmon/L NaCl and 10 mmon/L NaHCO 3 solutions, the seedings growth are better in 10 mmon/L NaHCO 3 . (3) Under the stress of such solutions of high concentration, certain degrees of endurance also present in the roots and lamina, with the anatomical results like the thicken of root endodermis, the enlargement of vascular bundle in diameter, the vanish of aerenchyma tissures and the closure of lamina stoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".