MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099053766 · doi:10.1128/jb.01690-06

S-Layer Anchoring and Localization of an S-Layer-Associated Protease in <i>Caulobacter crescentus</i>

2007· article· en· W2099053766 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew J. Ford, John F. Nomellini, John Smit

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bacteriology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsCaulobacter crescentusS-layerBiologyProteaseBacterial outer membraneProtein subunitAnchoringExtracellularCell biologyBiochemistryEscherichia coliEnzymeBacterial proteinGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The S-layer of the gram-negative bacterium Caulobacter crescentus is composed of a single protein, RsaA, that is secreted and assembled into a hexagonal crystalline array that covers the organism. Despite the widespread occurrence of comparable bacterial S-layers, little is known about S-layer attachment to cell surfaces, especially for gram-negative organisms. Having preliminary indications that the N terminus of RsaA anchors the monomer to the cell surface, we developed an assay to distinguish direct surface attachment from subunit-subunit interactions where small RsaA fragments are incubated with S-layer-negative cells to assess the ability of the fragments to reattach. In doing so, we found that the RsaA anchoring region lies in the first approximately 225 amino acids and that this RsaA anchoring region requires a smooth lipopolysaccharide species found in the outer membrane. By making mutations at six semirandom sites, we learned that relatively minor perturbations within the first approximately 225 amino acids of RsaA caused loss of anchoring. In other studies, we confirmed that only this N-terminal region has a direct role in S-layer anchoring. As a by-product of the anchoring studies, we discovered that Sap, the C. crescentus S-layer-associated protease, recognized a cleavage site in the truncated RsaA fragments that is not detected by Sap in full-length RsaA. This, in turn, led to the discovery that Sap was an extracellular membrane-bound protease, rather than intracellular, as previously proposed. Moreover, Sap was secreted to the cell surface primarily by the S-layer type I secretion apparatus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BacteriologySame topicBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207