MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099057558 · doi:10.1002/fld.1800

The natural volume method (NVM): Presentation and application to shallow water inviscid flows

2008· article· en· W2099057558 on OpenAlex
Riadh Ata, Azzeddine Soulaïmani, F. Chinesta

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInviscid flowQuadrilateralFinite volume methodShallow water equationsUpwind schemeMathematicsBoundary value problemVoronoi diagramApplied mathematicsFinite element methodMechanicsMathematical analysisGeometryPhysicsDiscretization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper a fully Lagrangian formulation is used to simulate 2D shallow water inviscid flows. The natural element method (NEM), which has been used successfully with several solid and fluid mechanics applications, is used to approximate the fluxes over Voronoi cells. This particle‐based method has shown huge potential in terms of handling problems involving large deformations. Its main advantage lies in the interpolant character of its shape function and consequently the ease it allows with respect to the imposition of Dirichlet boundary conditions. In this paper, we use the NEM collocationally, and in a Lagrangian kinematic description, in order to simulate shallow water flows that are boundary moving problems. This formulation is ultimately shown to constitute a finite‐volume methodology requiring a flux computation on Voronoi cells rather than the standard elements, in a triangular or quadrilateral mesh. St Venant equations are used as the mathematical model. These equations have discontinuous solutions that physically represent the existence of shock waves, meaning that stabilization issues have thus been considered. An artificial viscosity deduced from an analogy with Riemann solvers is introduced to upwind the scheme and therefore stabilize the method. Some inviscid bidimensional flows were used as preliminary benchmark tests, which produced decent results, leading to well‐founded hopes for the future of this method in real applications. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.418
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it