Patterns of Molt in Long-Tailed Ducks (<i>Clangula hyemalis</i>) during Autumn and Winter in the Great Lakes Region, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molt and migration can coincide in Arctic nesting waterfowl because they have little time between fledging and the severe weather that precipitates migration. Objectives were to observe how patterns in autumn and winter molt by Long-tailed Ducks (Clangula hyemalis) were influenced by nutrient reserves or seasonal life-cycle events. Molt scores and nutrient reserves were determined for birds salvaged during autumn 2011 (n = 79) and collected during winter 2002–2004 (n = 255). Differences in molt among sex-age classes and correlation between molt and nutrient reserves were determined. It was predicted that adult females and juveniles of both sexes suspended molt during autumn migration to limit energetic overlap; however, greater molt in juveniles during autumn than winter was detected. Correlation between molt and nutrient reserves were not detected. Molt was less in adult males than females and juveniles during winter, which may suggest that the effects of reproduction (females) and growth (juveniles) extended their molt into winter. Observed molt patterns are consistent with fixed cues associated with the timing of seasonal life-cycle events of this species. This could have important implications in understanding the life-cycle events of Long-tailed Ducks and provide novel explanations of seasonal molt.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".