Quantitative determination of ochratoxin A by liquid chromatography/electrospray tandem mass spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mass spectrometry of ochratoxin A (OTA) and B (OTB) under electrospray ionization (ESI) and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) was studied. ESI offers higher sensitivities and less fragmentation than APCI. A sensitive LC/MS/MS method for the determination of ochratoxin A (OTA) in human plasma samples was developed. The absolute minimum detection limit was around 10-20 pg per injection, corresponding to 0.5 ppb in an injection equivalent to 20-40microg of human plasma. Ochratoxin B (OTB) was used as an internal standard and its absence in real-life samples was carefully checked before samples were spiked with the internal standard. It was found that these two ochratoxins are susceptible to sodium adduct formation. Fragment ions from the [M + H](+) and [M + Na](+) ions of both OTA and OTB were monitored in the multiple reaction monitoring mode. Three quantitative approaches, standard addition method, internal standard method (using ochratoxin B as an internal standard) and external standard method, were compared in the analysis of human blood plasma. Results from the mass spectrometric method were comparable to those from a conventional LC/fluorescence method. The LC/MS/MS method was also applied to the analysis of contaminated coffee samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".