MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099227876 · doi:10.4141/cjas07071

The effect of fertilizing forage with sodium selenate on selenium concentration of hay, drain water and serum selenium concentrations in beef heifers and calves

2008· article· en· W2099227876 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kenric Walburger, Timothy DelCurto, G. D. Pulsipher, R. L. Hathaway, Gene J. Pirelli

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Animal Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSelenium in Biological Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaySeleniumAnimal scienceForageVenipunctureSodium selenateChemistryBiologyAgronomyMedicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objectives of this trial were to determine the effect of fertilizing grass/alfalfa pastures with sodium selenate on selenium (Se) concentration of hay, drain water and serum Se concentrations in heifers and their calves. A 9.7-ha grass alfalfa hay field was split into four strips, two of which were fertilized with 10g Se ha -1 on 2002 Apr. 20. Hay was harvested from the field on 2002 Jul. 01 and 2002 Aug. 25. Drain water from the field was collected at monthly intervals from 2002 Apr. 20 to 2002 Aug. 20. Thirty-six first calf heifers in the third trimester of gestation were assigned randomly to one of nine pens and pens were assigned randomly to one of three treatments in a completely random design. Treatments were: (1) a basal diet of Se fertilized hay and a mineral mix containing 180 mg Se kg -1 (+Se hay +Se mineral), (2) a basal diet of Se fertilized hay and a mineral mix containing no Se (+Se hay −Se mineral), and (3) a basal diet of non-Se fertilized hay and a mineral mix containing 180 mg Se kg -1 (−Se hay +Se mineral). Blood samples were collected via coccygeal venipuncture at the initiation of the trial and at calving. Twelve hours after birth a blood sample was collected from each calf via jugular venipuncture. Selenium fertilization increased (P < 0.05) Se concentration in the hay 12-fold in the first cutting and fourfold in the second cutting. Selenium was only detectable in the drain water 1 mo after fertilization (0.55 µg Se kg -1 ). Intake of Se was greatest (P < 0.05) for +Se hay +Se mineral heifers, intermediate for −Se hay +Se mineral heifers, and lowest for +Se hay −Se mineral heifers. Serum Se concentration of heifers was greater (P < 0.05) in +Se hay +Se mineral than in +Se hay −Se mineral heifers. Serum Se concentration of calves was higher (P< 0.05) in the +Se hay +Se mineral, intermediate in +Se hay −Se mineral calves, and lowest in −Se hay +Se mineral calves. Fertilization with sodium selenate can be used as an alternative method to provide Se to beef cattle in geographic regions where Se supplementation is required. Key words: Beef cattle, selenium, supplementation, fertilization

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Animal ScienceSame topicSelenium in Biological SystemsFrench-language works237,207