The Dependence of the Plasmon Field Induced Nonradiative Electronic Relaxation Mechanisms on the Gold Shell Thickness in Vertically Aligned CdTe−Au Core−Shell Nanorods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dependence of the plasmon field enhancement of the nonradiative relaxation rate of the band gap electrons in vertically aligned CdTe-Au core-shell nanorods on the plasmonic gold nanoshell thickness is examined. Increasing the thickness of the gold nanoshell from 15 to 26 nm is found to change the decay curve from being nonexponential and anisotropic to one that is fully exponential and isotropic (i.e., independent of the nanorod orientation with respect to the exciting light polarization direction). Analysis of the kinetics of the possible electronic relaxation enhancement mechanisms is carried out, and DDA simulated properties of the induced plasmonic field of the thin and thick gold nanoshells are determined. On the basis of the conclusions of these treatments and the experimental results, it is concluded that by increasing the nanoshell thickness the relaxation processes evolve from multiple enhancement mechanisms, dominated by highly anisotropic Auger processes, to mechanism(s) involving first-order excited electron ejection process(es). The former is shown to give rise to nonexponential anisotropic decays in the dipolar plasmon field of the thin nanoshell, while the latter exhibits an exponential isotropic decay in the unpolarized plasmonic field of the thick nanoshell.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".