Effect of anaesthetics[sol ]terminal procedures on neurotransmitters from non‐dosed and aroclor 1254‐dosed rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Subtle effects of low-dose exposure to environmental toxicants may be altered or masked by an inappropriate choice of anaesthesia prior to manipulation or termination of experimental animals. This study was designed to investigate effects of various anaesthetics and terminal procedures on neurotransmitters from male Sprague-Dawley rats. Significant changes in neurotransmitters were observed in the caudate nucleus, nucleus accumbens, hippocampus and substantia nigra but not the frontal cortex upon exposure to isoflurane, an Equithesin-like mixture or carbon dioxide relative to control animals that were decapitated without anaesthesia. Terminal use of any of these three anaesthetics also masked or altered some of the changes induced by exposure to Aroclor 1254. These results suggest that it is critical to avoid anaesthetizing experimental animals and that decapitation is the preferred method for euthanasia when conducting neurochemical studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".