MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099297620 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/2.4.239

Primary Hodgkin's disease of the CNS in an immunocompetent patient: Acase study and review of the literature

2000· article· en· W2099297620 on OpenAlexaff
Jim Biagi, Robert G. MacKenzie, Megan S. Lim, Michelle Sapp, Neil L. Berinstein

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBrain Metastases and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPediatric Oncology Group
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiseaseRadiation therapyCerebrospinal fluidHistopathologyCraniotomySurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary Hodgkin's disease limited to the CNS is exceedingly rare. Little is known regarding etiologic risk factors, optimal management, and prognosis. A case of Hodgkin's disease confined to the CNS, with cerebrospinal fluid negative for cytology, is described in an immunocompetent patient previously treated for hyperthyroidism with 131I. The patient underwent craniotomy, with resection of two lesions in close proximity within the parenchyma of the temporoparietal lobe. Histopathology revealed classic nodular sclerosing Hodgkin's disease, without evidence of Epstein-Barr viral infection. Treatment included radiation to the whole brain with a boost to the tumor bed. The patient made a full neurologic recovery and remains free of disease recurrence 21 months after treatment. A literature review has identified only 9 additional cases. Seven of 8 evaluable patients remain alive and free of recurrence with a median follow-up of 13 months. The risk factors for this presentation remain undefined. Although follow-up is short, radiotherapy alone appears to provide excellent disease-free survival. Chemotherapy may be reserved for patients with positive cerebrospinal fluid, extracranial disease, or subsequent relapse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicBrain Metastases and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207