Effects of indomethacin on systemic and renal haemodynamics in conscious lambs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Both prostaglandins (PGs) PGE(2) and PGI(2) can act as renal vasodilators, these effects being exacerbated when the renin-angiotensin system is activated. Therefore, we hypothesized that PGs would play a more predominant role in modulating renal haemodynamics in the newborn period, when the renin-angiotensin system is activated. To this end, the role of endogenously produced PGs in modulating systemic and renal haemodynamics was investigated in two groups of conscious lambs aged approximately 1 and approximately 6 weeks. Arterial pressure, venous pressure and renal blood flow were measured for 5 min before (control) and for 20 min after intravenous injection of vehicle (experiment 1). Twenty-four hours later, this protocol was repeated with intravenous injection of the non-selective cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (1 mg kg(-1), experiment 2). Heart rate was calculated from the systolic peak of the arterial pressure waveform, and renal vascular resistance (RVR) was calculated from the measured variables. In response to indomethacin but not vehicle, in both age groups of lambs there was an increase in mean arterial pressure and pulse interval, as well as a marked increase in RVR. These responses to indomethacin were, however, transient, with baseline levels being resumed within minutes. Although the hypothesis that PGs play a greater role in modulating renal haemodynamics early in life is not supported, these data do provide evidence that endogenously produced PGs modulate systemic and renal haemodynamics during postnatal maturation. It is apparent, however, that other vasoactive factors must be rapidly recruited in order to buffer the circulatory responses to removal of vasodilatory PGs in the developing newborn.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".