Comparative in vitro activity and post-antibiotic effect of gemifloxacin against Legionella spp.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The comparative in vitro potency and post-antibiotic effect (PAE) of gemifloxacin (SB-265805), moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin and rifampicin were evaluated against Legionella pneumophila serogroups 1-9 and 12 (n = 204) and other Legionella spp. (n = 34). MICs were determined by standard two-fold agar dilution. PAE was determined by exposing the isolates to the test agents at 4 x MIC for 1 h. Trovafloxacin was the most potent agent overall (MIC range < or =0.004-0.016 mg/L, MIC(90) < or =0.008 mg/L). Of the other quinolones tested, gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin, grepafloxacin and levofloxacin were more potent (MIC(90) 0.016 mg/L) against L. pneumophila than ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin (MIC(90) 0. 03 mg/L). Against Legionella spp., the test quinolones were more potent (MIC range < or =0.004-0.06 mg/L) than either erythromycin or azithromycin (MIC(90) 0.5 and 0.25 mg/L, respectively). Gemifloxacin had the longest PAE (4.65 h) of the agents tested against erythromycin-resistant L. pneumophila. Of the quinolones, only gemifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin and ofloxacin had PAEs of >3 h against erythromycin-resistant Legionella spp. Azithromycin, erythromycin and clarithromycin had PAEs of <3 h against all erythromycin-resistant strains. Against erythromycin-susceptible L. pneumophila, only gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin, ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin had PAEs of >3 h, and only rifampicin, ofloxacin, gemifloxacin and erythromycin had PAEs of >2 h against erythromycin-susceptible Legionella spp. The superior potency of gemifloxacin compared with erythromycin indicates that it may be of use in the treatment of legionellosis. The significant PAE described here, combined with favourable pharmacokinetics, supports once-daily dosing for gemifloxacin in the treatment of legionella infections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".