D<scp>YNAMICAL</scp>P<scp>HENOMENA IN</scp>L<scp>IQUID</scp>-C<scp>RYSTALLINE</scp>M<scp>ATERIALS</scp>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
▪ Abstract Recent progress in modeling and simulation of the flow of nematic liquid crystals is presented. The Leslie-Ericksen (LE) theory has been successful in elucidating the flow of low molar-mass nematics. The theoretical framework for the flow of polymeric nematic liquid crystals is still evolving; extensions of the Doi theory capture qualitative features of the flow of polymeric nematics in simple geometries, but these theories have not been shown to predict texture development in flow. Mesoscopic theories for textured materials based on spatial averaging capture only some qualitative features of nonrectilinear liquid-crystalline polymer flow. Interfacial effects in liquid-crystalline systems have begun to receive attention in the context of interfacial viscoelasticity and the dynamics of dispersed liquid-crystalline polymers in immiscible blends.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.058 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".