MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Working in Canada's Subarctic: Circumpolar Medicine

2006· article· en· W2099518167 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gary Podolsky

Bibliographic record

VenueWilderness and Environmental Medicine · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircumpolar starThe arcticUnit (ring theory)WildernessLibrary scienceMedicineGeographyPsychologyEcologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medical practice in Churchill is a challenging and rewarding form of wilderness medicine. If any reader is interested in learning more about Churchill or would like to consider visiting or even taking a health care position here, the following resources and contacts are available: The website for Churchill Independent Travel (www.creighton.edu/hutchens/church_travel.html) gives a complete list of options for those wishing to plan their own trip. The Arctic Medicine Conference is a medical conference with talks in Zoonoses, Dentistry, Entomology, and Travel Medicine hosted by Wilderness Medicine in Manitoba (www.skylarkmedicalclinic.com). The JA Hildes Northern Medical Unit is responsible for providing qualified physicians and nurse practitioners to staff northern Manitoba. For those who are interested, please contact Michelle Vandenbroeck at 1(204)789-3711 for information in working in Churchill or other parts of the Hudson Bay Inuit communities (www.umanitoba.ca/faculties/medicine/units/ northern_medical_unit). 1,000 Places to See Before You Die, by Patricia Schultz, is a recent bestseller that gives information about polar bear safaris.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1140.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWilderness and Environmental MedicineSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207