The safety and efficacy of recombinant human blood coagulation factor IX in previously untreated patients with severe or moderately severe hemophilia B
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This international clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of recombinant factor IX (rFIX) in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe or moderately severe hemophilia B (FIX activity, < or = 3 IU/dL). Sixty-three PUPs aged younger than 1 month to 14 years received rFIX (median treatment duration, 37 months; range, 4-64 months). Mean rFIX recovery (0.68 +/- 0.27 IU/dL per IU/kg) remained constant over 5 years and was similar in infants (1 month to < 2 years) and children (2 to < 12 years). Fifty-four PUPs used rFIX (median dose, 62.7 IU/kg per infusion; range, 8.2-292 IU/kg) to treat 997 hemorrhages. Bleeding was well controlled, with 75% of hemorrhages requiring only one rFIX infusion. Response to rFIX was "excellent" or "good" in 94% of cases. Effective hemostasis was achieved in 32 PUPs receiving rFIX for routine prophylaxis, with 91% of prophylaxis responses rated "excellent." rFIX administered for 30 surgical procedures in 23 PUPs achieved hemostasis for all rated procedures. Five patients experienced allergic-type manifestations, including 2 (3%) patients who developed FIX inhibitors (both > 5 BU/dL). rFIX was well tolerated, with no associated thrombotic events or evidence of viral transmission. These data indicate that rFIX is a safe and effective treatment for PUPs with hemophilia B.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".