SCE1, the SUMO-Conjugating Enzyme in Plants That Interacts with NIb, the RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase of Turnip Mosaic Virus, Is Required for Viral Infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMOylation, which is catalyzed by small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) enzymes, is a transient, reversible posttranslational protein modification that regulates diverse cellular processes. Potyviruses, the largest group of known plant viruses, comprise many agriculturally important viruses, such as Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV). The potyviral genome encodes 11 mature proteins. To investigate if SUMOylation plays a role in potyvirus infection, a yeast two-hybrid screen was performed to examine possible interactions of each of the 11 viral proteins of TuMV with AtSCE1, the only SUMO-conjugating enzyme in Arabidopsis thaliana homologous to the key SUMO-conjugating enzyme E2 in mammalian cells or Ubc9 in yeast. A positive reaction was found between AtSCE1 and NIb, the potyviral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Further bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) assays revealed that the NIb and AtSCE1 interaction occurred in both the cytoplasm and nuclei of epidermal cells of Nicotiana benthamiana. The interaction motif was mapped to a region encompassing NIb amino acids 171 to 300 which contains a potential negatively charged amino acid-dependent SUMOylation motif (NDSM). An Escherichia coli SUMOylation assay showed that NIb can be SUMOylated and that the lysine residue (K172) in the motif is a potent SUMOylation site. A TuMV infectious clone with an arginine (R) substitution mutation at K172 compromised TuMV infectivity in plants. In comparison with wild-type Arabidopsis plants, sce1 knockdown plants exhibited increased resistance to TuMV as well as a nonrelated RNA virus. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report showing that the host SUMO modification system plays an essential role in infection by plant RNA viruses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".