MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099769239 · doi:10.1093/carcin/21.6.1259

Tumors arising in DNA mismatch repair-deficient mice show a wide variation in mutation frequency as assessed by a transgenic reporter gene

2000· article· en· W2099769239 on OpenAlexaff
Agnes Baross-Francis, M.Kate Milhausen, Susan E. Andrew, Gareth Jevon, Frank R. Jirik

Bibliographic record

VenueCarcinogenesis · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSomatic hypermutationMSH2BiologyMutationPMS2Lac repressorMutation frequencyTransgeneGeneDNA mismatch repairGenetically modified mouseMolecular biologyCancer researchGene mutationGeneticsReporter geneDNA repairGermline mutationGene expressionRepressorAntibodyB cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We reported previously that thymic lymphomas arising in mice lacking the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene, Msh2(-/-), exhibited striking elevations in the mutation frequency of a transgenic lacI reporter gene when compared with normal Msh2(-/-) tissues. To investigate whether hypermutation was a feature of all tumors arising in MMR-deficient mice, lacI transgene mutation frequencies were obtained from several different mouse tumors deficient for PMS2 and/or MSH2. While lacI gene hypermutation was again clearly evident in Msh2 +/- ms2(-/-) and Msh2(-/-)Pms2(-/-) thymic lymphomas, three non-thymic MSH2-deficient tumors failed to show lacI gene mutation frequency elevations when compared with a normal tissue of MMR-deficient mice. The elevated mutation frequencies in the lymphoid tumors, and the finding of multiple clustered mutations in lacI genes rescued from these tumors, suggest that they are possibly generated by a lymphoma-specific hypermutational mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCarcinogenesisSame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207