Bibliographic record
Abstract
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a vasculitis that involves medium- and large-sized vessels. Typically presenting with localised headache, temporal artery tenderness, jaw claudication and ophthalmological complications, it can also affect large vessels, leading to limb claudication. We describe a patient presenting with acute coronary syndrome but who was also noted to have absent upper limb pulses, leading to a speculative diagnosis of GCA. According to the American College of Rheumatology, the patient met the criteria for both giant cell arteritis and Takayasu's arteritis. The gold standard investigation for diagnosing GCA is the temporal artery biopsy. Although contemplated, it was argued by the reviewing rheumatologist that this would not alter her management. She was thus commenced on prednisolone 60 mg daily, which led within 2 days to a rapid fall in erythrocyte sedimentation rate to 66 mm/h, and by day 11 this had dropped further to 4 mm/h.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".