MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099803956 · doi:10.1042/bj20020997

Ca2+-dependent and phospholipid-independent binding of annexin 2 and annexin 5

2002· article· en· W2099803956 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicole D. BROOKS, Jean E. Grundy, Nadine Lavigne, Mélanie C. Derry, Christina M. Restall, Roger C. MacKenzie, David M. Waisman, Edward L.G. Pryzdial

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemical Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicS100 Proteins and Annexins
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British ColumbiaInstitute for Biological SciencesUniversity of OttawaCanadian Blood Services
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Blood Services
KeywordsAnnexin A2AnnexinPhospholipidDissociation constantAnnexin A5ChemistryBinding siteBiophysicsBiochemistryMolecular biologyBiologyIn vitroReceptorMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Annexins are a family of homologous proteins that associate with anionic phospholipid (aPL) in the presence of Ca(2+). Evidence that the function of one annexin type may be regulated by another was recently reported in studies investigating cytomegalovirus-aPL interactions, where the fusogenic function of annexin 2 (A2) was attenuated by annexin 5 (A5). This observation suggested that A2 may bind directly to A5. In the present study, we demonstrated this interaction. The A2-A5 complex was first detected utilizing (covalently linked) fluorescein-labelled A5 (F-A5) as a reporter group. The interaction required concentrations of Ca(2+) in the millimolar range, had an apparent dissociation constant [ K (d)(app)] of 1 nM at 2 mM Ca(2+) and was independent of aPL. A2 bound comparably with F-A5 pre-equilibrated with an amount of aPL that could bind just the F-A5 or to an excess amount of aPL providing sufficient binding sites for all of F-A5 and A2. A2-A5 complex formation was corroborated in an experiment, where [(125)I]A2 associated in a Ca(2+)-dependent manner with A5 coated on to polystyrene. Surface plasmon resonance was used as a third independent method to demonstrate the binding of A2 and A5 and, furthermore, supported the conclusion that the monomeric and tetrameric forms of A2 bind equivalently to A5. Together these results demonstrate an A2-A5 interaction and provide an explanation as to how A5 inhibits the previously reported A2-dependent enhancement of virus-aPL fusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemical JournalSame topicS100 Proteins and AnnexinsFrench-language works237,207