Hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HF-SRT) for peri-optic pituitary adenomas – Early results of a novel experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objective To report our early experience with a novel Hypo-fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy (HF-SRT) regimen in the treatment of pituitary adenomas located in close proximity to the optic apparatus. Methods Twelve patients were treated using HF-SRT— total doses of 35-40 Gy in 7-10 fractions (4-5 Gy/fx). Sixty seven percent received 40 Gy in 10 fractions. Doses were prescribed to the 80-95% isodose line when the technique was cone-based, and to 85-95% of the Planning Target Volume (PTV) when IMRT-based. The end-points were visual function preservation, and local control as defined by follow-up MRI and/or biochemical control. Results Median age was 44.5 years. Sixty seven percent (8/12) had secretory adenomas. Median tumor volume as 5.8 cc. Median follow-up was 18.5 months. Mean marginal tumor dose was 42.7 Gy. Mean minimum distance from the optic chiasm was 2.3 mm. Mean maximum dose to the optic apparatus was 36 Gy. Visual improvement/stabilization rate was 87.5% (7/8). Radiological local control rate was 92% (11/12), CR in 25% (3/12), PR in 33% (4/12), SD in 33% (4/12), and PD in 8% (1/12). Endocrinological response was seen in all patients with abnormal hormone levels prior to therapy (8/8). Acute toxicity included headaches (42%) and nausea (8%). One patient with a previous history of pituitary hemorrhage suffered an episode of pituitary apoplexy 2 months after HF-SRT. Another patient with history of prior full dose conventional radiotherapy 2.5 years prior to HF-SRT, developed dissection and thrombosis of the right internal carotid artery. Conclusions Early results of HF-SRT (4-5 Gy/fx) in 7-10 fractions show comparable radiological and endocrinological tumor control to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy or single fraction SRS, with excellent visual preservation. Longer follow-up is needed to ascertain efficacy and long term toxicity of this technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".