MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099903683 · doi:10.2514/6.2009-3703

Modeling Flow over a Circular Cylinder with a Stepwise Discontinuity

2009· article· en· W2099903683 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venue39th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWakeVortexVortex sheddingCylinderPhysicsDownwashMechanicsDiscontinuity (linguistics)Horseshoe vortexWake turbulenceFlow (mathematics)Kármán vortex streetClassical mechanicsVortex ringGeometryTurbulenceReynolds numberMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flow past a circular cylinder with a single stepwise discontinuity was investigated using an unsteady RANS based numerical approach for ReD = 300. The primary focus was on the vortex shedding phenomena occurring in the wake of a step cylinder. Based on the numerical results, three distinct spanwise vortex cells were identified in the step cylinder wake. A comparative analysis with available experimental data showed that the numerical simulations adequately modeled not only wake vortex development but also interactions between the identified vortex cells in the near wake region. One of the vortex cells, forming in the vortex interaction region downstream of the step, was found to have a quasi-periodic appearance, with the periodicity being linked to downwash fluctuations near the step. In addition to spanwise wake vortices, the results suggest that streamwise vortices develop at the step, and that unsteady interactions between the streamwise and spanwise vortices occur. Nomenclature CD = drag coefficient, FD/(0.5ρLDU2) CD,L = local drag coefficient for the large cylinder CD,S = local drag coefficient for the small cylinder D = large cylinder diameter d = small cylinder diameter FD = drag force in x direction f = vortex shedding frequency fL = vortex shedding frequency of the L-Cell fN = vortex shedding frequency of the N-Cell fS = vortex shedding frequency of the S-Cell L = span of the cylinder NC = number of spanwise cells in a region of 1D surrounding the step ReD = Reynolds number, UD/ν St = Strouhal number, fD/U T = period of the N-Cell cycle U = free-stream velocity in x direction u, v, w = streamwise, transverse, and spanwise velocity components X, Y, Z = streamwise, transverse, and spanwise coordinates ρ = density ν = kinematic viscosity I.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it