MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099915385 · doi:10.1139/v00-088

Synthesis, characterization, and reactivity of scandium chloro, alkyl, aryl, and borohydride complexes, Sc(η<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>5</sub>)R[N(SiMe<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>P<sup>i</sup>Pr<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>] (R = Cl, Me, Ph, and BH<sub>4</sub>)

2000· article· en· W2099915385 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael D. Fryzuk, G.R. Giesbrecht, Steven J. Rettig

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryReactivity (psychology)BorohydrideArylLigand (biochemistry)Crystal structureCrystallographyStereochemistryMedicinal chemistryMetathesisNMR spectra databaseNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyAlkylCatalysisSpectral lineOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reaction of ScCl2(THF)[N(SiMe2CH2PiPr2)2] with NaCp(DME) leads to Sc(η5-C5H5)Cl[N(SiMe2CH2PiPr2)2] (1). The X-ray crystal structure shows the scandium centre to reside in a square pyramidal environment with the [N(SiMe2CH2PiPr2)2] - ligand bound in a pseudo-meridional fashion. The 1H NMR spectrum is consistent with a Cs symmetric structure in solution. Metathesis of the chloride ligand with RLi (R = Me, Ph, BH4) yields the five-coordinate species Sc(η5-C5H5)R[N(SiMe2CH2PiPr2)2]. Phenyl 3 and borohydride 4 are isolated as crystalline solids, while methyl 2 resisted crystallization. 2-4 exhibit 1H NMR spectra consistent with Cs symmetric solution structures. Sc(η5-C5H5)Ph[N(SiMe2CH2PiPr2)2] (3) was characterized in the solid state and found to have a similar geometry to that of the parent chloride. Reaction of Sc(η5-C5H5)Me[N(SiMe2CH2PiPr2)2] (2) with NH2R (R = Ph, tBu) yields the amides Sc(η5-C5H5)NHPh[N(SiMe2CH2PiPr2)2] (5) and Sc(η5-C5H5)NHtBu [N(SiMe2CH2PiPr2)2] (6) via σ-bond metathesis routes; these reactions are accompanied by a competing reaction at the scandium-amide bond to produce the protonated ligand, HN(SiMe2CH2PiPr2)2. 5 and 6 are also produced by salt-elimination from the chloride 1 and LiNHR (R = Ph, tBu). Sc(η5-C5H5)(BH4)[N(SiMe2CH2PiPr2)2] (4) reacts with PMe3 to produce the putative hydride, Sc(η5-C5H5)H[N(SiMe2CH2PiPr2)2] (7); this species was identified in solution. An equilibrium between 4, PMe3, 7, and PMe3·BH3 exists which greatly favors the starting scandium-borohydride. Crystals of Sc(η5-C5H5)Cl[N(SiMe2CH2PiPr2)2] (1) are monoclinic, a = 17.409(2), b = 10.0803(7), c = 17.688(2) Å, β = 94.606(8)°, Z = 4, space group P21/c; and those of Sc(η5-C5H5)Ph[N(SiMe2CH2PiPr2)2] (3) are triclinic, a = 10.5129(15), b = 19.124(2), c = 9.114(2) Å, α = 95.582(13), β = 107.047(12), γ = 90.042(11)°, Z = 2, space group P. The structures were solved by Patterson (1) and direct (3) methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares procedures to R = 0.047 and 0.054 (Rw = 0.042 and 0.049) for 2414 and 2844 reflections with I [Formula: see text] 3σ(I), respectively.Key words: scandium, σ-bond metathesis, borohydride.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compoundsFrench-language works237,207