MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Impact of Trade Barriers on Mandated Biofuel Consumption in Canada

2011· article· en· W2099933748 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Danny G. Le Roy, Amani Elobeid, K. K. Klein

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsLimitingAgricultural economicsConsumption (sociology)AgricultureBiofuelEthanol fuelEconomicsAgricultural scienceEngineeringEnvironmental scienceWaste managementGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A customized version of the deterministic Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) modeling system was used to assess the impacts of two alternative scenarios: (1) an increase in Canadian ethanol demand to 10% of domestic liquid fuel consumption by 2011 met through increased ethanol imports, and (2) the same increase in Canadian ethanol demand met only through increased domestic supply. The results reveal import barriers injure Canadian consumers by limiting their access to supplies offered for sale at lower prices by more efficient producers, particularly those located in subtropical regions. With freer trade, the domestic ethanol price would fall while the world price would rise due to the higher demand for ethanol in Canada. The results also show that import restrictions directly undermine the effectiveness and increase the costliness of a higher consumption mandate in Canada. The relatively less expensive ethanol is for the final consumer, the more likely they will use it as fuel over available alternatives. The implication is that restricting imports of ethanol is counterproductive to the policy objective of increasing domestic ethanol consumption. Nous avons utilisé une version adaptée du système de modélisation déterministe du Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) pour évaluer les répercussions de deux scénarios possibles : 1. une hausse de la demande canadienne d’éthanol équivalant à dix pour cent de la consommation intérieure de combustible liquide d’ici 2011 grâce à l’augmentation des importations d’éthanol; 2. la même hausse grâce, cette fois, à l’augmentation des approvisionnements intérieurs seulement. Nos résultats ont indiqué que les obstacles à l’importation lèsent les consommateurs canadiens en limitant leur accès à des approvisionnements offerts à faibles prix par des producteurs plus efficaces, en particulier ceux des régions subtropicales. En présence d’une libéralisation accrue des échanges, le prix intérieur de l’éthanol reculerait tandis que le prix mondial augmenterait en raison de l’accroissement de la demande d’éthanol au Canada. Nos résultats ont également indiqué que les restrictions à l’importation réduisent directement l’efficacité et augmentent la cherté du mandat visant à stimuler la consommation d’éthanol au Canada. Plus le prix de l’éthanol sera abordable pour le consommateur final, plus ce dernier sera enclin à l’utiliser comme combustible par rapport aux autres sources disponibles. Imposer des restrictions à l’importation d’éthanol fait plus de tort que de bien à l’objectif de la politique qui vise à accroître la consommation intérieure d’éthanol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.157
Teacher spread0.136 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomieSame topicBiofuel production and bioconversionFrench-language works237,207