MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099953756 · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/138/5/1271

AN INTENSIVE<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>SURVEY FOR<i>z</i>&gt;1 TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE BY TARGETING GALAXY CLUSTERS

2009· article· en· W2099953756 on OpenAlexaff
Kyle Dawson, G. Aldering, R. Amanullah, K. Barbary, L. Felipe Barrientos, M. Brodwin, N. Connolly, Arjun Dey, Mamoru Doi, Megan Donahue, Peter Eisenhardt, E. Ellingson, L. Faccioli, V. Fadeyev, H. K. Fakhouri, A. S. Fruchter, David Gilbank, M. D. Gladders, G. Goldhaber, Anthony H. Gonzalez, A. Goobar, A. Gude, Takashi Hattori, Henk Hoekstra, Xiaosheng Huang, Y. Ihara, Buell T. Jannuzi, David Johnston, Nobunari Kashikawa, Benjamin P. Koester, K. Konishi, M. Kowalski, C. Lidman, Eric V. Linder, L. M. Lubin, J. Meyers, Tomoki Morokuma, Ferah Munshi, C. R. Mullis, Oda T, N. Panagia, S. Perlmutter, Marc Postman, T. A. Pritchard, Jason Rhodes, P. Rosati, D. Rubin, David J. Schlegel, A. L. Spadafora, S. A. Stanford, V. Stanishev, Daniel Stern, M. Strovink, N. Suzuki, N. Takanashi, K. Tokita, M. Wagner, L. Wang, Naoki Yasuda, H. K. C. Yee

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Waterloo
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationSpace Telescope Science InstituteSmithsonian Institution
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsSupernovaGalaxyHubble space telescopeRedshiftRedshift surveyAstronomyCosmologyExtinction (optical mineralogy)Wide Field Camera 3Galaxy cluster

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Americanae nace como un proyecto conjunto que surge dentro de la Red Europea de Información y Documentación sobre América Latina (REDIAL), y que ha afrontado la Biblioteca de la Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo (AECID). Esta nueva biblioteca virtual hace más accesibles los libros digitales de tema americanista a los investigadores y usuarios interesados de cualquier parte del mundo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207