MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099978602 · doi:10.1086/344730

Chlamydial Heat‐Shock Protein–60 Antibody and Correlation with<i>Chlamydia pneumoniae</i>in Atherosclerotic Plaques

2002· article· en· W2099978602 on OpenAlexaff
I. W. Fong, Brian Chiu, Esther Viira, William Tucker, Heidi Wood, Rosanna Ŵ. Peeling

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaHealth CanadaManitoba HealthUniversity of TorontoUniversity of AlbertaSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChlamydiaAntigenChlamydophila pneumoniaeChlamydiaceaeAntibodyImmune systemHeat shock proteinChlamydialesMicrobiologyImmunologyBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study was performed to determine whether serum antibody to Chlamydial heat-shock protein-60 (CHSP-60) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were associated with the presence of Chlamydia pneumoniae in atheromatous plaques in 75 patients. The mean (+/-SD) ELISA optical density (OD) of anti-CHSP-60 was 0.19+/-0.15 in 54 patients with detectable C. pneumoniae antigen, versus an OD of 0.11+/-0.08 in 21 patients without detectable C. pneumoniae I antigen (P=.008). Higher anti-CHSP-60 at an OD > or =0.12 was present in 38 (70.4%) of patients with detectable C. pneumoniae in atheromas, compared with 5 (23.8%) of patients without C. pneumoniae antigen (P<.001; 2-tailed test). The mean CRP concentration was 7.4+/-10.3 mg/L in patients with detectable C. pneumoniae antigen, versus 5.7+/-6.1 mg/L in those without (P=.556). Immune response to CHSP-60 may play a role in atherogenesis, but CRP serum levels does not appear to be related to C. pneumoniae infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207