Chlamydial Heat‐Shock Protein–60 Antibody and Correlation with<i>Chlamydia pneumoniae</i>in Atherosclerotic Plaques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A study was performed to determine whether serum antibody to Chlamydial heat-shock protein-60 (CHSP-60) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were associated with the presence of Chlamydia pneumoniae in atheromatous plaques in 75 patients. The mean (+/-SD) ELISA optical density (OD) of anti-CHSP-60 was 0.19+/-0.15 in 54 patients with detectable C. pneumoniae antigen, versus an OD of 0.11+/-0.08 in 21 patients without detectable C. pneumoniae I antigen (P=.008). Higher anti-CHSP-60 at an OD > or =0.12 was present in 38 (70.4%) of patients with detectable C. pneumoniae in atheromas, compared with 5 (23.8%) of patients without C. pneumoniae antigen (P<.001; 2-tailed test). The mean CRP concentration was 7.4+/-10.3 mg/L in patients with detectable C. pneumoniae antigen, versus 5.7+/-6.1 mg/L in those without (P=.556). Immune response to CHSP-60 may play a role in atherogenesis, but CRP serum levels does not appear to be related to C. pneumoniae infection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".