A new large caseid (Synapsida, Caseasauria) from the Permian of Rodez (France), including a reappraisal of “<i>Casea</i>”<i>rutena</i>Sigogneau-Russell & Russell, 1974
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The description of a new large caseid, Ruthenosaurus russelbrum n. gen., n. sp. from the Early Permian (upper Cisuralian to lower Lopingian) of the Rodez Basin, France, is based on a partial postcranial skeleton that was initially collected at the same time as the holotype of “Cásea” rutena Sigogneau-Russell & Russell, 1974. Despite its distinctly larger size than “C.” rutena, the holotype of Ruthenosaurus n. gen. clearly represents an immature individual, as shown most clearly by the lack of fusion of the neural arches to their respective vertebral centra and incomplete ossification of the ends of the limb elements, including the absence of an ossified olecranon on the ulna. Nonetheless, Ruthenosaurus n. gen. is diagnosed by several autapomorphic characters, including dorsal vertebrae with anteriorly tilting neural spines and a diamond-shaped outline in transverse section, a first sacral rib with a dorsoventrally expanded distal head, and a low iliac blade with a poorly developed anterior process. The new taxon is further distinguishable from the only other known French caseid, “Casea” rutena, by the shape of the distal part of the humerus, including an ectepicondylar notch rather than a fully enclosed foramen, the specific shape of the ulna, and the overall robustness of the specimen. The taxonomic status of “Cased” rutena is discussed and it is concluded that this species should be moved into a new genus named Euromycter n. gen. The occurrence of the large-sized Ruthenosaurus n. gen. in France increases our knowledge about the early diversity of this clade in Europe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".