MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100054585 · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fss091

Spawning history influence on fecundity, egg size, and egg survival of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) from the Miramichi River, New Brunswick, Canada

2012· article· en· W2100054585 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jenny E. Reid, Gérald Chaput

Bibliographic record

VenueICES Journal of Marine Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaBritish Columbia Salmon Farmers Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFecunditySalmoBiologyFisheryPopulationReproductionZoologyFish <Actinopterygii>EcologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Reid, J. E., and Chaput, G. 2012. Spawning history influence on fecundity, egg size, and egg survival of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) from the Miramichi River, New Brunswick, Canada. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 69: 1678–1685. There is an increasing abundance of repeat spawners in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) population in the Miramichi River that, owing to their larger size, can be expected to contribute greater egg depositions and better offspring survival than primarily maiden spawning populations. Currently, there is little information on the reproductive contribution of repeat-spawning salmon. In this study, the fecundity, egg size, and egg survival for 235 maiden and repeat-spawning wild female Atlantic salmon were examined over a period of 3 years. Relative fecundity did not differ among the largest body size group of salmon, but consecutive repeat spawners had a higher fecundity than maiden 2SW salmon and alternate repeat spawners. Egg diameter also increased with body size, but consecutive repeat spawners had significantly smaller eggs, in absolute terms and relative to their body size, than maiden 2SW salmon and alternate repeat spawners. The egg survival rate of consecutive repeat spawners was significantly lower than that of 2SW maiden salmon and alternate repeat spawners. Consecutive repeat spawners are different in that egg diameter and egg survival did not follow the general positive association with female body size, probably because of the short time that they spend reconditioning in the ocean and consequently their available energy reserves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueICES Journal of Marine ScienceSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207