Competition in the Parasitization of Callosobruchus maculatus between Dinarmus basalis and Choetospila elegans on Vigna unguiculata (Walp.) Seeds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Laboratory study was carried out to investigate the efficacy of hymenopteran parasitoids, (<em>Dinarmus basalis</em> and <em>Choetospila elegans)</em> parasitization of <em>Callosobruchus maculatus</em> on cowpea (<em>Vigna unguiculata</em>) seeds in the Department of Crop Science, University of Calabar, Nigeria. Treatments were the inoculation of <em>D. basalis</em> (sole), <em>C. elegans</em> (sole), a mixture of <em>D. basalis</em> and <em>C. elegans</em> into infested cowpea seeds and the control which received no parasitoids. The introduction of parasitoids was repeated at 3 d interval, and all treatments were replicated 3 times. Result indicated that early introduction of the parasitoids caused significantly (P ? 0.05) higher mortality of <em>C.maculatus</em> than late introduction. Mix culture of both parasitoids was significantly more efficacious than sole culture. The emergence of each parasitoid and the mortality of <em>C. maculatus</em> in sole culture showed a highly significant (P ? 0.01) positive relationship (r = 0.487) between <em>C. maculatus</em> and <em>D. basalis</em> but non-significant (P ? 0.05) though positive association (r = 0.289) with <em>C. elegans</em>. A multiple regression analysis between <em>C. maculatus </em>mortality and the emergence of the two parasitoids in mix culture also indicated a highly positive significant (P ? 0.01) relationship (R = 0.751, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.564). Pearson Correlation analysis also showed a significant (P ? 0.05) positive association (r = 0.464, and 0.401) between <em>C. maculatus</em> mortality and emergence of <em>C. elegans</em> and <em>D. basalis</em> in mix culture, respectively. However, a non significant (P ? 0.05) negative relationship (r = -0.336) was observed between the two parasitoids in their emergence in mix culture, but <em>D. basalis</em> contributed more to the mortality of <em>C. maculatus</em> than <em>C. elegans</em>. Data from this study showed that <em>D. basalis</em> and <em>C. elegans</em> have potentials to be deployed as biological control entities in the management of <em>C. maculatus</em> as a part of the integrated pest management strategies of storage pests in the tropics.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".