MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100133434 · doi:10.1002/hyp.9382

Monitoring the melt season length of the Barnes Ice Cap over the 1979–2010 period using active and passive microwave remote sensing data

2012· article· en· W2100133434 on OpenAlexaffabout
Florent Dupont, Alain Royer, Alexandre Langlois, Alicia Gressent, Ghislain Picard, M. Fily, P. Cliche, Miroslav Chum

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrological Processes · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceArcticClimatologyMicrowave radiometerBrightness temperatureSpecial sensor microwave/imagerMicrowaveRadiometerScatterometerRemote sensingGeologyWind speedOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Barnes Ice Cap (BIC) located on Baffin Island (Nunavut, Canada) is one of the most southern ice caps of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Observational data provide evidence of increased melting, thinning and contour recession due to recent climate warming in the Arctic. The duration of the summer melt season for the BIC, over the period 1979–2010, was derived using a threshold algorithm for 19 GHz horizontal polarization brightness temperature data; the passive microwave satellite measurements included data from the quasi‐daily Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer and the Special Sensor Microwave Imager. Our results show the melt season lengthened by 33% from 65.6 ± 6 days at the beginning of the period (1979–1987) to 87.1 ± 7.8 days towards the end (2002–2010). The interannual variations of the number of melt days were in agreement with those derived from active microwave backscatter data from the QuikSCAT scatterometer for the overlapping 2000–2009 period. In addition, elevation change data from the ICESat altimeter confirmed the thinning of the BIC at a mean rate of −0.75 m/year for the 2003–2009 period. For the 32‐year period that we analysed, correlations with summer and annual air temperature and annual sum of positive days were examined for both the North American Regional Reanalysis and the Clyde River Automatic Weather Station data. Correlations with land surface temperature data from MODIS were also examined over the last decade. The results of these investigations showed that these climate indicators did not adequately explain the observed melt variations for the BIC. Ground‐based snow and ice measurements collected near the BIC summit during a 10‐day field campaign in March 2011 provided insights onto the surface properties and confirm the relevance of the remote sensing invariant threshold algorithm used for melt detection. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.692

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHydrological ProcessesSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207