MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100133998 · doi:10.1111/rda.12249

Risk of Transmission of Bovine Herpesvirus‐1 (<scp>BHV</scp>‐1) by Infected Semen to Embryo Recipients and Offspring

2013· article· en· W2100133998 on OpenAlexaff
A. Bielański, J. Algire, A. Lalonde, Amalia Garceac

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction in Domestic Animals · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and Retrovirus Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbryoEmbryo transferInseminationSemenOffspringBiologyArtificial inseminationBovine herpesvirus 1AndrologyEndometriumPregnancyVirusVirologyMedicineEndocrinologyViral diseaseHerpesviridaeGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contents Infection with bovine herpesvirus‐1 (BHV‐1), also called infectious bovine rhinotracheitis/infectious pustular vulvovaginitis virus, is associated with a variety of respiratory, neurological and infertility health problems causing worldwide economic losses and trading restrictions to the livestock industry. Although there is a considerable amount of information about the risk ofBHV‐1 transmission through contaminated semen used for artificial insemination, there is no available evidence to indicate whether the resulting embryos, when used for embryo transfer (ET), can lead to the transmission ofBHV‐1 to recipients and offspring. For this study, cryopreserved bull semen contaminated withBHV‐1 was used for artificial insemination (AI) of seronegative, superovulated heifers (N = 43). Embryos were collected post‐mortem at 7 days post‐insemination and were washed according to the International Embryo Transfer Society (IETS) guidelines.BHV‐1 was detected in all samples of follicular fluid, oviductal epithelial cells, endometrium and corpora lutea tissues and a proportion of unwashed (52 of 120, 43%) and washed oocytes and embryos (7 of 113, 6%) collected from embryo donors. Of the 396 collected, unfertilized oocytes and embryos, only 29 (7%) were ofETquality. Most of the embryos and oocytes were degenerated (N = 224, 57%) or unfertilized (N = 143, 36%). The 13 heifers, which each received a single morula‐stage washed embryo, maintained seronegative status, but only two (15%) became pregnant and deliveredBHV‐1‐free calves. In conclusion, results suggest that embryos fertilized withBHV‐1‐contaminated semen may not result in disease transmission to embryo recipients or their offspring when embryos are processed according toIETSand the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) guidelines. However, due to the transmission ofBHV‐1 viaAIto embryo donors and the apparent adverse effect ofBHV‐1 on the quality of the embryos, it is unlikely that the procedure can be justified for a commercial application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction in Domestic AnimalsSame topicT-cell and Retrovirus StudiesFrench-language works237,207