Risk of Transmission of Bovine Herpesvirus‐1 (<scp>BHV</scp>‐1) by Infected Semen to Embryo Recipients and Offspring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents Infection with bovine herpesvirus‐1 ( BHV ‐1), also called infectious bovine rhinotracheitis/infectious pustular vulvovaginitis virus, is associated with a variety of respiratory, neurological and infertility health problems causing worldwide economic losses and trading restrictions to the livestock industry. Although there is a considerable amount of information about the risk of BHV ‐1 transmission through contaminated semen used for artificial insemination, there is no available evidence to indicate whether the resulting embryos, when used for embryo transfer ( ET ), can lead to the transmission of BHV ‐1 to recipients and offspring. For this study, cryopreserved bull semen contaminated with BHV ‐1 was used for artificial insemination ( AI ) of seronegative, superovulated heifers (N = 43). Embryos were collected post‐mortem at 7 days post‐insemination and were washed according to the International Embryo Transfer Society ( IETS ) guidelines. BHV ‐1 was detected in all samples of follicular fluid, oviductal epithelial cells, endometrium and corpora lutea tissues and a proportion of unwashed (52 of 120, 43%) and washed oocytes and embryos (7 of 113, 6%) collected from embryo donors. Of the 396 collected, unfertilized oocytes and embryos, only 29 (7%) were of ET quality. Most of the embryos and oocytes were degenerated (N = 224, 57%) or unfertilized (N = 143, 36%). The 13 heifers, which each received a single morula‐stage washed embryo, maintained seronegative status, but only two (15%) became pregnant and delivered BHV ‐1‐free calves. In conclusion, results suggest that embryos fertilized with BHV ‐1‐contaminated semen may not result in disease transmission to embryo recipients or their offspring when embryos are processed according to IETS and the World Organization for Animal Health ( OIE ) guidelines. However, due to the transmission of BHV ‐1 via AI to embryo donors and the apparent adverse effect of BHV ‐1 on the quality of the embryos, it is unlikely that the procedure can be justified for a commercial application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".