Are cardiovascular and sympathoadrenal effects of human “new pressor protein” preparations attributable to human coagulation β-FXIIa?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"New pressor protein" (NPP) derived from normal human plasma is an extra renal enzyme that shares strong sequence homology with human coagulation beta-FXIIa. Under our bioassay conditions, human NPP (10-20 microl plasma equivalent/ approximately 300 g rat iv) can raise the systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 40-50 mmHg, the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 15-20 mmHg, and the heart rate (HR) by 70-90 beats/min. Plasma epinephrine (of adrenal medullary origin) and norepinephrine rise by about 50- and 10-fold, respectively. Because beta-FXIIa is not normally associated with pressor properties, we endeavored to substantiate that the hypertensive effects of impure NPP preparations used in our experiments are attributable to their content of beta-FXIIa. We carried out comparisons with highly purified (>90%) commercial human beta-FXIIa and found that by gel filtration (Sephadex G-100 and G-75), NPP bioactivity appeared in the approximately 30-kDa elution zone, consistent with the molecular mass of beta-FXIIa. Retention time using fast-protein liquid chromatography anion exchange chromatography was identical. Molecular mass and comigration were confirmed by SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis, and the recovered approximately 30-kDa protein bands yielded beta-FXIIa fragments identified by mass spectrometry. Matched doses of the NPP preparations produced dose-response curves very similar to those elicited by beta-FXIIa with respect to increments of SBP, DBP, and HR, whereas plasma catecholamine increments were generally comparable. We propose that beta-FXIIa is substantially, if not exclusively, responsible for the observed effects of our NPP preparations and that this points to a novel axis connecting the FXII coagulation cascade and the sympathoadrenal gland to other cardiovascular regulatory mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".