Synthesis of reduction-sensitive 1,1-diarylhydrazines from 1,1-diarylamines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1-(2-Nitrophenyl)-1-phenylamine and methyl 4-((2-nitrophenyl)amino)benzoate have been transformed into their corresponding urea derivatives through the action of chlorosulfonyl isocyanate. The initial sulfimidate product from the former reaction has sufficient stability so that it can be isolated and characterized as its disodium salt, and this, as well as three other subsequent products, have been characterized by X-ray diffraction. The corresponding intermediary urea was converted into its hydrazine derivative via a Hofmann rearrangement under oxidative conditions. Density functional theory has been used to examine the nature of the intermediates and transition states for the Hofmann rearrangement. There is little theoretical indication for a cyclic aziridinonium intermediate and the transition state between the urea and the isocyanate corresponds to a reactant-like rotation of the planar singlet nitrene before migration and formation of the new N−N bond.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".