CAD model for circuit parameters of superconducting-based hybrid planar transmission lines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using the concept of surface impedance associated with a superconductor or normal conductor's plate, we extend the CAD (computer aided design) formalisms on modeling and simulation of superconducting and normal transmission lines (STL and NTL) in order to include hybrid transmission lines (HTL). STL and NTL are entirely made of superconductor or normal conductor materials, respectively. In this paper, HTL refers to a planar transmission line (TL) such as parallel plate (PPTL), microstrip (μTL) and coplanar waveguide (CPW) whose ground plate is superconducting and whose top/center strip is a normal conductor or vice versa. We develop and present a set of closed-form equations in a tidy and succinct form for each configuration (STL, NTL and HTL) for widely-used planar TLs (PPTL, μTL and CPW). They can be easily implemented in a systematic way by the user for the purpose of fast TL design. The results obtained with this CAD tool are compared with previously reported results in the literature, and good agreement is observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".