Increasing the Paralyzing Ability of a Laboratory Colony of <I>Dermacentor andersoni</I> Stiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Field-collected Rocky Mountain wood ticks Dermacentor andersoni Stiles from British Columbia caused limited paralysis in hamsters at high doses, but not at lower doses, while ticks collected from Alberta failed to cause paralysis. This prompted development of a laboratory strain of ticks with a more consistent ability to cause paralysis. Progeny of ticks that paralyzed a cow near Walhachin, British Columbia were reared and assayed for paralyzing ability. A high-virulence colony was selected for four generations using female ticks that cause paralysis singly on hamsters. A low-virulence colony was concurrently selected using female ticks that failed to cause paralysis at four ticks per hamster. Logistic regression indicated that the paralyzing ability of the high-virulence colony was consistently higher than that of the low-virulence colony, but that the paralyzing ability of both colonies increased through four generations of selection. Ticks required storage at 10 degrees C to terminate behavioral diapause. The effects of prolonged storage at 10 degrees C on the paralyzing ability of ticks was estimated and was small compared with differences between colonies and across generations. Single ticks from the high-virulence colony caused an increasing proportion of paralysis with each generation, but only limited paralysis with no increase across generations for the low-virulence colony. Single ticks from the high-virulence colony that caused paralysis were similar in weight and percent weight gain compared with single ticks that failed to cause paralysis. Engorged weight and egg mass production after four generations of rearing in the laboratory were similar to that measured for field-collected adults. Results indicated that laboratory selection could increase paralysis, but not eliminate it. This was likely a result of an inability to select male ticks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".