MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Distinct gene-sex interactions regulate adult rat cardiomyocyte width and length independently

2002· article· en· W2100421717 on OpenAlexaff
Isabelle Boutin-Ganache, Sylvie Picard, Christian F. Deschepper

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiological Genomics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsMontreal Clinical Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCongenicLocus (genetics)BiologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) and WKY-derived hyperactive (WKHA) rats are two genetically-related inbred strains of rats that are both normotensive yet exhibit differences in left ventricular mass (LVM). We had shown previously that cardiomyocytes from male WKHA are wider than that of male WKY, and that there was genetic linkage between LVM and a locus on chromosome 5 (RNO5) in the male progeny of a F2 WKHA/WKY cross. We show here that cardiomyocyte width is linked to the same RNO5 locus in male reciprocal congenic rats derived from WKHA and WKY. Contrary to males, we found no genetic linkage between LVM and the RNO5 locus in female rats. However, ventricular hypertrophy in females might be of a different nature, because cardiomyocytes from female WKHA were shorter than their WKY counterparts (with no difference in width). The RNO5 locus contains that of the natriuretic peptide precursor A (Nppa) gene. In male congenic rats, changes in cardiomyocyte width always correlated with reciprocal changes in the LV concentration of atrial natriuretic factor (ANF, i.e., the peptide product of Nppa). Taken together with other functional data, the small size of the RNO5 locus (approximately 63 cR) increased the likelihood that both cardiomyocyte width and LV ANF concentration could be linked to only one gene (possibly Nppa) in male rats. Moreover, our results support the notion that genes and sex interact to regulate cardiomyocyte width and length independently from one another.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiological GenomicsSame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207