MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100490950 · doi:10.1109/ultsym.2006.462

P2L-3 Effects of Sound Field and Acoustic Streaming on Nanometer Sized Diamond Particles Dispersion System using Ultrasound

2006· article· en· W2100490950 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Norimichi Kawashima, Shotaro Takeuchi, Takeyoshi Uchida, T. Kikuchi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicUltrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrophoneAcoustic streamingMaterials scienceDispersion (optics)CavitationSound pressureDiamondAcousticsAcoustic waveStanding waveOpticsComposite materialUltrasonic sensorPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We reported the improvement of dispersion of nanometer sized diamond particles using shock wave and active oxygen species by acoustic cavitation at 155 kHz in 2004 IEEE International UFFC Joint 50th Anniversary Conference in Montreal. Average sound pressure calculated from sound pressure distribution in horizontal plane at distance of 10 mm from a stainless steel vibrating disk in water tank was used as acoustic index for improvement of dispersion of the diamond particles. The measured horizontal plane was on the loop of the standing wave acoustic field. However, improvement of dispersion characteristics of the particles was performed in whole water in the water tank. Therefore, each sound pressure distribution in horizontal plane at the distances of 10 mm to 95 mm from the stainless steel vibrating disk was measured by hydrophone. Sound pressure distribution all over water in the water tank was observed three dimensionally. The generation of active oxygen species in the water tank was estimated by observation of sonochemical luminescence. As the results, higher sound pressure than 100 kPa was measured in central region lower than height of 55 mm from the stainless steel vibrating disk in the water tank. Sonochemical luminescence could not be observed in above region in the water tank. They were contradictory results. We guess that the acoustic streaming prevents from trapping cavitation bubble at the loop of standing wave sound field. We think that the acoustic streaming is one cause of the contradictory results. Homogenous sound pressure distribution is required improvement of dispersion characteristics of nanometer sized diamond particles by ultrasound exposure

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.419

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasound and Cavitation PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207