MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100545096 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2013-0048

In situ dynamic piezocone penetrometer tests in natural clayey soils — a reappraisal of strain-rate corrections

2013· article· en· W2100545096 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPenetrometerGeotechnical engineeringPenetration testCone penetration testPore water pressureGeologySubmarine pipelineSiltPenetration (warfare)Soil waterEngineeringSoil scienceGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cone penetration testing with pore pressure measurement (CPTU) is a cost- and time-efficient way of collecting in situ geotechnical parameters of near-surface marine soils for cable and pipeline tracks, offshore foundations, and geohazard identification. The measured dynamic CPTU parameters (cone penetration resistance, sleeve friction, pore pressure) are higher than the measured static CPTU parameters. This mismatch is caused by the different penetration rates used for dynamic and static CPTU tests (dynamic tests have up to 500 times higher penetration rates than the static tests; i.e., with the commonly used 2 cm/s penetration rate). This study presents comprehensive Calypso piston and gravity core as well as dynamic and static CPTU datasets acquired in the landslide-prone Sørfjorden area (Finneidfjord, northern Norway). The fjord-marine sediments at the study site are characterized as normally consolidated to slightly over consolidated clay-dominated soils with embedded layers of sandy silt to sand. The dynamic CPTU results were corrected to match the nearby static CPTU (i.e., distance less than 10 m) using strain-rate factors (SF) derived from three known correction methods. Based on a statistical test and visual comparison of dynamic and static CPTU profiles, the modified inverse sin-hyperbolic correction method is found to be best suited for the strain-rate correction of dynamic CPTU tests, and results in SF less than 1.35 for the corrected cone penetration resistance and up to 2.4 for the sleeve friction. Our data illustrate a positive correlation between penetration rate and penetration depth, which is governed by the consolidation state of the clays. The good agreement between SF-corrected dynamic CPTU data from 34 deployments (acquired within less than 36 h shiptime) with data obtained from static CPTU and laboratory experiments on sediment cores further demonstrates that the MARUM dynamic CPTU device is a powerful tool for characterizing the properties of surficial seafloor sediments in shallow-water environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it