MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100580942 · doi:10.1080/07060660109506959

Temporal occurrence and impact of <i>Scytalidium uredinicola</i> , a mycoparasite of western gall rust

2001· article· en· W2100580942 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Bruce Moltzan, Peter V. Blenis, Y. Hiratsuka

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest ServiceUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Forest ServiceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGallRust (programming language)BiologySporePerennial plantPucciniaBiological pest controlBotanyGerminationHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scytalidium uredinicola Kuhlman et al. is considered an important mycoparasite of western gall rust caused by Endocronartium harknessii (J.P. Moore) Y. Hiratsuka (= Peridermium harknessii J.P. Moore). The temporal occurrence of S. uredinicola and its impact on the ability of western gall rust spores to germinate were determined. Scytalidium uredinicola was not isolated from either external or internal tissues of 3- to 5-year-old galls at any time of the year. However, it was isolated from the external, but not internal, tissues of 6- to 9-year-old galls in most months and from both external and internal tissues of 10+-year-old galls in all months. On galls older than 10 years, S. uredinicola overwintered beneath the periderm and colonized developing rust sori prior to peridial rupture in April. Spore viability of western gall rust was consistently reduced by 85% throughout the period of sporulation over two sporulating seasons. Because S. uredinicola requires considerable time to become persistent and perennial, artificial establishment of the hyperparasite in the early stages of gall rust epidemics might be required to make it an effective biological control agent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFrench-language works237,207