THE PGE AND BASE-METAL ALLOYS IN THE PODIFORM CHROMITITES OF THE LUOBUSA OPHIOLITE, SOUTHERN TIBET
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PGE and base-metal alloy minerals from podiform chromitites of the Luobusa ophiolite, southern Tibet include Os-Ir, Os-Ir-Ru, Pt-Fe, Ir-Ni-Fe, Fe-Ni-Cr, and Fe-Co with highly variable compositions. Small amounts of diamond, graphite, SiC, an unnamed chromium carbide, iron silicide (Fe-Si), and native Fe, Ni, Cr, Au, Cu and Si also are present. The alloys and native elements were recovered primarily from heavy-mineral separates of the chromitites, but some are included in, or attached to, magnesiochromite grains. They are mostly subhedral to anhedral and range in size from about 0.05 to 0.5 mm. Some grains have euhedral crystal forms and others have round shapes, suggestive of melt droplets. Fe-Ni-bearing, Ru-rich PGE alloys, Fe-Ni and Fe-Co alloys and native Fe and Ni in the Luobusa chromitites are interpreted as secondary minerals formed by alteration of PGE sulfides. The Pt-Fe, Os-Ir, and Ir-Ni-Fe alloys, Fe silicide and perhaps the native Si are considered to be xenocrysts from the mantle, transported to shallow depths by a rising plume and then captured by the melts from which the Luobusa chromitites crystallized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".